affaan-m/ecc

token-budget-advisor

Offer a choice of response depth (25%/50%/75%/100%) with token estimates before answering, then answer at that level.

查看源码

使用方法

  1. 复制安装命令,在自己的智能体环境安装前先检查源码包。
  2. 从原始文档核对所需工具、凭据和支持的宿主。
  3. 说明输入材料与期望交付物,并对照来源检查输出。
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ecc --skill token-budget-advisor

开始前需了解

  • 安装不包含模型订阅、API 额度或访问文件的权限。
  • 仓库星数和安装量反映活跃情况,不等于独立质量或安全测试。
仓库原始内容

按源仓库内容呈现,保留标题、案例、代码、表格、链接以及原文引用的演示图片。

Token Budget Advisor (TBA)

Intercept the response flow to offer the user a choice about response depth before Claude answers.

When to Use

  • User wants to control how long or detailed a response is
  • User mentions tokens, budget, depth, or response length
  • User says "short version", "tldr", "brief", "al 25%", "exhaustive", etc.
  • Any time the user wants to choose depth/detail level upfront

Do not trigger when: user already set a level this session (maintain it silently), or the answer is trivially one line.

How It Works

Step 1 — Estimate input tokens

Use the repository's canonical context-budget heuristics to estimate the prompt's token count mentally.

Use the same calibration guidance as context-budget:

  • prose: words × 1.3
  • code-heavy or mixed/code blocks: chars / 4

For mixed content, use the dominant content type and keep the estimate heuristic.

Step 2 — Estimate response size by complexity

Classify the prompt, then apply the multiplier range to get the full response window:

ComplexityMultiplier rangeExample prompts
Simple3× – 8×"What is X?", yes/no, single fact
Medium8× – 20×"How does X work?"
Medium-High10× – 25×Code request with context
Complex15× – 40×Multi-part analysis, comparisons, architecture
Creative10× – 30×Stories, essays, narrative writing

Response window = input_tokens × mult_min to input_tokens × mult_max (but don’t exceed your model’s configured output-token limit).

Step 3 — Present depth options

Present this block before answering, using the actual estimated numbers:

Analyzing your prompt...

Input: ~[N] tokens  |  Type: [type]  |  Complexity: [level]  |  Language: [lang]

Choose your depth level:

[1] Essential   (25%)  ->  ~[tokens]   Direct answer only, no preamble
[2] Moderate    (50%)  ->  ~[tokens]   Answer + context + 1 example
[3] Detailed    (75%)  ->  ~[tokens]   Full answer with alternatives
[4] Exhaustive (100%)  ->  ~[tokens]   Everything, no limits

Which level? (1-4 or say "25% depth", "50% depth", "75% depth", "100% depth")

Precision: heuristic estimate ~85-90% accuracy (±15%).

Level token estimates (within the response window):

  • 25% → min + (max - min) × 0.25
  • 50% → min + (max - min) × 0.50
  • 75% → min + (max - min) × 0.75
  • 100% → max

Step 4 — Respond at the chosen level

LevelTarget lengthIncludeOmit
25% Essential2-4 sentences maxDirect answer, key conclusionContext, examples, nuance, alternatives
50% Moderate1-3 paragraphsAnswer + necessary context + 1 exampleDeep analysis, edge cases, references
75% DetailedStructured responseMultiple examples, pros/cons, alternativesExtreme edge cases, exhaustive references
100% ExhaustiveNo restrictionEverything — full analysis, all code, all perspectivesNothing

Shortcuts — skip the question

If the user already signals a level, respond at that level immediately without asking:

What they sayLevel
"1" / "25% depth" / "short version" / "brief answer" / "tldr"25%
"2" / "50% depth" / "moderate depth" / "balanced answer"50%
"3" / "75% depth" / "detailed answer" / "thorough answer"75%
"4" / "100% depth" / "exhaustive answer" / "full deep dive"100%

If the user set a level earlier in the session, maintain it silently for subsequent responses unless they change it.

Precision note

This skill uses heuristic estimation — no real tokenizer. Accuracy ~85-90%, variance ±15%. Always show the disclaimer.

Examples

Triggers

  • "Give me the short version first."
  • "How many tokens will your answer use?"
  • "Respond at 50% depth."
  • "I want the exhaustive answer, not the summary."
  • "Dame la version corta y luego la detallada."

Does Not Trigger

  • "What is a JWT token?"
  • "The checkout flow uses a payment token."
  • "Is this normal?"
  • "Complete the refactor."
  • Follow-up questions after the user already chose a depth for the session

Source

Standalone skill from TBA — Token Budget Advisor for Claude Code. Original project also ships a Python estimator script, but this repository keeps the skill self-contained and heuristic-only.

按任务相关推荐

来自同一仓库

更多 Skills

全部 Skills
affaan-m
社区

agent-self-evaluation

Use after completing any non-trivial task. The agent self-rates its output on 5 axes — accuracy, completeness, clarity, actionability, conciseness — with concrete evidence per criterion. Produces a structured 1-5 scorecard with specific improvement suggestions.

安装量
3
GitHub Stars
28.7万
最近更新
10月20日
affaan-m
社区

configure-ecc

Run the conversational ECC setup wizard inside the current harness: inventory the install, collect scope (user/project/local) and hook mode (off/minimal/standard/strict) in Claude Code, use Codex's native plugin lifecycle, or install the project surface under ./.kimi-code, then preview, apply, and verify. Use when installing, updating, reconfiguring, or repairing an ECC installation, changing hook profiles, or moving ECC between install scopes.

安装量
3
GitHub Stars
28.7万
最近更新
10月20日
affaan-m
社区

contract-first

Coordinate frontend/backend or service-to-service work through one authoritative machine-checkable contract (OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, Protocol Buffers, or JSON Schema), with generated consumer types and contract-verified integration. Use when parallel consumer and provider work must evolve an API or event schema without field drift, mock/production shape mismatch, or one side silently redefining the interface.

安装量
3
GitHub Stars
28.7万
最近更新
10月20日
affaan-m
社区

django-patterns

Django architecture patterns, REST API design with DRF, ORM best practices, caching, signals, middleware, and production-grade Django apps. Use when building or reviewing Django apps, DRF APIs, ORM queries, or caching.

安装量
3
GitHub Stars
28.7万
最近更新
10月20日