brilliantrough/agent-skills

quick-do

Execute small, well-understood changes directly in the current session with minimal ceremony and ponytail taste.

Quelltext ansehen
Originales Skill-Dokument

Aus dem Quell-Repository gerendert; Überschriften, Beispiele, Code, Tabellen, Links und Bilder bleiben erhalten.

Quick Do: understand → do → verify

Choose the workflow

  • An explicit user choice takes precedence. Do not silently switch workflows; if the chosen one cannot safely fit the task, explain the mismatch and ask about the necessary adjustment.
  • Without an explicit choice: use quick-do for clear, bounded changes; steady-do for ordinary feature work or unresolved design decisions; plan-brief for long-horizon work needing a durable plan and separate-session execution.
  • Judge by uncertainty, coupling, risk, and handoff needs, not prompt length or file count. If unsure between quick and steady, use steady. If a handoff would help but was not requested, propose it before changing who executes; complexity alone does not authorize a handoff.
  • These workflows govern requested development work, not every explanation or read-only question. Skill instructions are in English; replies and deliverables follow the user's language (Chinese by default).

Do the work

  • Read the request, applicable project rules, and affected files before editing. Inspect relevant callers when changing shared behavior; avoid unrelated exploration.
  • Prefer the obvious interpretation for ordinary implementation details. Ask at most one focused clarification in the normal quick path; if investigation reveals substantial ambiguity or risk, stop and propose steady-do rather than guessing to satisfy the question limit.
  • No plan documents, grilling sessions, or sub-agents. Use a todo only when the work or host instructions warrant it; do not create a planning ceremony.
  • Keep the smallest working change: reuse existing code, then stdlib/native features, then installed dependencies. No over-encapsulation, speculative abstractions, defensive boilerplate, redundant checks, or unrelated cleanup. Preserve necessary trust-boundary validation, security, accessibility, and data protection.
  • Before destructive or irreversible actions, show the impact and obtain explicit authorization. A quick workflow does not permit overwriting secrets or changing unrelated environments.

Verify and finish

  • Default to the smallest real execution path plus a reread of the change; check the requested behavior, not merely the absence of errors. For documentation-only changes, inspect content and applicable format checks.
  • Do not add tests, TDD, or verification scripts by default. Follow explicit user requests and mandatory project checks; those are not waived by this workflow.
  • Report only what actually ran. A static check, successful load, or injected input is not proof of end-to-end behavior. If execution is unavailable, state what remains unverified and the concrete user check.
  • Finish in one short line stating the change and verification status, including a blocker or required user check when present. No separate report or summary essay; required product docs and project memory still apply.
aus demselben Repository

Weitere Skills

Alle Skills
brilliantrough
Community

code-review

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to \"review since X\".

Installationen
1
GitHub Stars
3
Aktualisiert
20. Sept.
brilliantrough
Community

domain-modeling

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a CONTEXT.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

Installationen
1
GitHub Stars
3
Aktualisiert
20. Sept.
brilliantrough
Community

exp-probe

Run one-off research spot experiments with minimal ceremony. Use when explicitly requested, or for a missing datapoint, a rerun after failure (OOM, crash), a sanity check of one configuration, a minimal bug reproduction, or a cheap measurement that a campaign needs before deciding. At most one focused question; run, record, report in one line. Escalate to exp-batch if the spot check turns into a branch, or exp-campaign if it reveals a decision tree; if the question itself is still fuzzy, route back to exp-discuss.

Installationen
1
GitHub Stars
3
Aktualisiert
20. Sept.
brilliantrough
Community

grill-with-docs

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.

Installationen
1
GitHub Stars
3
Aktualisiert
20. Sept.