brilliantrough/agent-skills

quick-do

Execute small, well-understood changes directly in the current session with minimal ceremony and ponytail taste.

Voir la source
Document Skill original

Rendu depuis le dépôt source en conservant titres, exemples, code, tableaux, liens et images.

Quick Do: understand → do → verify

Choose the workflow

  • An explicit user choice takes precedence. Do not silently switch workflows; if the chosen one cannot safely fit the task, explain the mismatch and ask about the necessary adjustment.
  • Without an explicit choice: use quick-do for clear, bounded changes; steady-do for ordinary feature work or unresolved design decisions; plan-brief for long-horizon work needing a durable plan and separate-session execution.
  • Judge by uncertainty, coupling, risk, and handoff needs, not prompt length or file count. If unsure between quick and steady, use steady. If a handoff would help but was not requested, propose it before changing who executes; complexity alone does not authorize a handoff.
  • These workflows govern requested development work, not every explanation or read-only question. Skill instructions are in English; replies and deliverables follow the user's language (Chinese by default).

Do the work

  • Read the request, applicable project rules, and affected files before editing. Inspect relevant callers when changing shared behavior; avoid unrelated exploration.
  • Prefer the obvious interpretation for ordinary implementation details. Ask at most one focused clarification in the normal quick path; if investigation reveals substantial ambiguity or risk, stop and propose steady-do rather than guessing to satisfy the question limit.
  • No plan documents, grilling sessions, or sub-agents. Use a todo only when the work or host instructions warrant it; do not create a planning ceremony.
  • Keep the smallest working change: reuse existing code, then stdlib/native features, then installed dependencies. No over-encapsulation, speculative abstractions, defensive boilerplate, redundant checks, or unrelated cleanup. Preserve necessary trust-boundary validation, security, accessibility, and data protection.
  • Before destructive or irreversible actions, show the impact and obtain explicit authorization. A quick workflow does not permit overwriting secrets or changing unrelated environments.

Verify and finish

  • Default to the smallest real execution path plus a reread of the change; check the requested behavior, not merely the absence of errors. For documentation-only changes, inspect content and applicable format checks.
  • Do not add tests, TDD, or verification scripts by default. Follow explicit user requests and mandatory project checks; those are not waived by this workflow.
  • Report only what actually ran. A static check, successful load, or injected input is not proof of end-to-end behavior. If execution is unavailable, state what remains unverified and the concrete user check.
  • Finish in one short line stating the change and verification status, including a blocker or required user check when present. No separate report or summary essay; required product docs and project memory still apply.
du même dépôt

Autres Skills

Tous les Skills
brilliantrough
Communauté

code-review

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to \"review since X\".

installations
1
GitHub Stars
3
Mis à jour
20 sept.
brilliantrough
Communauté

domain-modeling

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a CONTEXT.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

installations
1
GitHub Stars
3
Mis à jour
20 sept.
brilliantrough
Communauté

exp-probe

Run one-off research spot experiments with minimal ceremony. Use when explicitly requested, or for a missing datapoint, a rerun after failure (OOM, crash), a sanity check of one configuration, a minimal bug reproduction, or a cheap measurement that a campaign needs before deciding. At most one focused question; run, record, report in one line. Escalate to exp-batch if the spot check turns into a branch, or exp-campaign if it reveals a decision tree; if the question itself is still fuzzy, route back to exp-discuss.

installations
1
GitHub Stars
3
Mis à jour
20 sept.
brilliantrough
Communauté

grill-with-docs

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.

installations
1
GitHub Stars
3
Mis à jour
20 sept.