Verwendung
- Installationsbefehl kopieren und das Quellpaket vor der Installation in der eigenen Agentenumgebung prüfen.
- Benötigte Werkzeuge, Zugangsdaten und Hosts im Original prüfen.
- Eingabe und gewünschtes Ergebnis beschreiben und die Ausgabe mit den Quellen abgleichen.
npx skills add https://github.com/elementalsouls/claude-bughunter --skill recon-scope-triageVor dem Start
- Die Installation umfasst weder Modellabo noch API-Kontingent oder Dateizugriffsrechte.
- Sterne und Installationen zeigen Aktivität, keine unabhängige Qualitäts- oder Sicherheitsprüfung.
Originales Skill-Dokument
Aus dem Quell-Repository gerendert; Überschriften, Beispiele, Code, Tabellen, Links und Bilder bleiben erhalten.
When to use this skill
Trigger when:
- The target brand is a common/dictionary word or shared term (e.g.
apex,summit,vertex,nova,core,orbit,pulse,unity…) - You receive an ASM report, recon export, breach combo, repo list, bucket list, or mobile-app list to act on
- A "Critical" count looks implausibly high (hundreds) for the org's size
- Any asset's ownership is asserted by the tool but not proven
The two failure modes this skill prevents:
- Wasting the engagement testing/triaging assets that aren't the target's.
- Attacking an innocent third party that merely shares the name — out of scope, and real harm.
Rule: ownership is guilty-until-proven. An asset is the target's only when a concrete ownership signal ties it to the target — never because a scanner's keyword matched.
The collision sources (where keyword-matching lies)
| Recon source | How it collides | Verify ownership by |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub repos | Search matched the brand word in repo name / topic / a string | Repo owner is the org's GH org; commits from org emails; code references the org's real domains/infra. A repo named <word>-backend by a random user = noise. |
| Cloud buckets (S3/GCS) | Bucket names are a global namespace; <word>-static, <word>-data, <word>-public exist for someone | Bucket content references the target; bucket name correlates with a confirmed target subdomain (x.target.com ↔ x-public) AND content matches; ACL/owner metadata. Generic content (other-language, other-industry) = not theirs. |
| Mobile apps | Store search matched the brand word in app name / package | Publisher account = the org; package reverse-DNS = an owned domain (com.<owneddomain>.app); dev cert; app calls owned API hosts. Mature ASM tools emit an "apps_accepted=0" / ownership-confidence field — read it. |
| Breach corpora / combos | Email local-or-domain contains the brand word | Exact owned-domain match only (@target.com), not @<word>group.com / @something<word>.com. A different domain that contains the word is a different org. |
| Typosquats | Generated permutations of the name | These are defensive/brand-protection findings, not offensive scope — note and move on. |
| Stack/forum/paste hits | Brand word in body | Body references the target's real domain/subdomain/employee/secret. Ownership-confidence < threshold = drop. |
Web "Critical" triage — the soft-404 control
Automated .env / .git / actuator / admin-panel "Criticals" are overwhelmingly soft-404s: SPA/framework catch-alls returning HTTP 200 (or 403) for every path. Verify EACH before believing it:
bash
# the "finding"
curl -s -o /tmp/a -w "%{http_code} %{size_download}\n" https://host.target.com/.env
# a junk control on the same host
curl -s -o /tmp/b -w "%{http_code} %{size_download}\n" https://host.target.com/zzz-nonsense-$RANDOM
# identical byte length / body → FALSE POSITIVE (catch-all), discard
cmp -s /tmp/a /tmp/b && echo "SOFT-404 false positive" || echo "differs — investigate"Real exposures have a content-type + signature that differs from the catch-all (.git/config starts [core]; .env has KEY=value; phpinfo has the XHTML-transitional doctype + PHP Version). A physical .php/phpinfo.php that returns a bigger/different body than the junk control is the real-vs-soft-404 tell.
The triage workflow
- Confirm the canonical owned-domain set first (the SOW/program domain + its verified subdomains + the verified Entra/Okta/Google tenant brand name). This is your ownership anchor.
- For each asset class, apply the verify-by column above. No signal → quarantine, don't test.
- Re-baseline the severity counts against only-owned assets. Report the delta — "N Criticals → M after ownership + soft-404 triage" is itself a finding about the ASM program.
- Quarantine collisions explicitly (a
loot/quarantined_<source>.txt) so it's auditable that you saw them and chose not to target them. - Surface the meta-finding: if the supplied ASM/recon feed is mostly false-positive, that misallocates the owner's remediation budget and buries real risk — write it up (Medium/Strategic).
Anti-patterns
- Trusting the tool's "owned" label. Tools keyword-match; they don't prove ownership. Verify.
- Targeting a same-named third party because it was "in the report." Out of scope + real harm. A combo line
user@<word>company.comis a different company's employee. - Reporting soft-404s as exposures. Always run the junk-path control.
- Counting typosquats / missing-headers / brand-collision repos as offensive findings. They're defensive/hygiene/noise — they pad the report and erode credibility.
- Skipping triage "to save time." Untriaged, you spend the whole engagement on other people's assets and find nothing real.
Why this matters (calibration)
For a target whose brand is a common word, expect the bulk of automated "owned" assets to be collisions:
- Repos that are unrelated open-source projects (ad-block lists, scrapers, student projects, a different company's SDK) merely containing the word.
- Mobile apps published by entirely different companies that share the name — banks, credit unions, dating apps, dispensaries, home-care services are all real-world collision categories. (Good ASM tooling will tell you it accepted zero as owned.)
- Cloud buckets in the global namespace holding some unrelated org's content (other-language documents, demo/sample data, another industry's files).
- Breach combos full of emails from sibling-named-but-different companies (
<word>group.com,<region><word>.com).
On a real engagement against a dictionary-word brand, after clearing this noise the only genuinely-owned high-severity finding was discoverable solely by manual tradecraft (a JS-bundle → API discovery, see hunt-spa-api) — it was nowhere in the hundreds of scanner "Criticals." Triage-first is what made the engagement productive instead of a goose chase.
Related Skills & Chains
- `triage-validation` — asset-ownership triage (this skill) precedes finding-validity triage (the 7-Question Gate). Ownership first, then validity.
- `redteam-mindset` — "aggressive default" means probe every owned live surface; this skill defines which surfaces are owned so persistence isn't wasted on collisions.
- `hunt-spa-api` — once an API host passes ownership triage, this is how you test it.
- `offensive-osint` / `osint-methodology` — feed ownership anchors (verified domains, tenant brand, dev accounts) from OSINT into this triage.
