lilmgenius/paperthin

re0-work

Restart a project or artifact from v0 while preserving only proven lessons, contracts, gates, vocabulary, real-surface tests, and negative corpus.

Quelltext ansehen

Verwendung

  1. Installationsbefehl kopieren und das Quellpaket vor der Installation in der eigenen Agentenumgebung prüfen.
  2. Benötigte Werkzeuge, Zugangsdaten und Hosts im Original prüfen.
  3. Eingabe und gewünschtes Ergebnis beschreiben und die Ausgabe mit den Quellen abgleichen.
npx skills add https://github.com/lilmgenius/paperthin --skill re0-work

Vor dem Start

  • Die Installation umfasst weder Modellabo noch API-Kontingent oder Dateizugriffsrechte.
  • Sterne und Installationen zeigen Aktivität, keine unabhängige Qualitäts- oder Sicherheitsprüfung.
Originales Skill-Dokument

Aus dem Quell-Repository gerendert; Überschriften, Beispiele, Code, Tabellen, Links und Bilder bleiben erhalten.

Start over from what the previous cycle proved, not from what it happened to build.

Goal

re0-work is a controlled restart. It keeps earned knowledge and refuses to copy forward accidental architecture. Starting from scratch is not amnesia: contracts, schemas, vocabulary, real-surface tests, quality gates, and negative corpus survive when they earned it. Scaffold, explanatory UI, debug panels, shallow generated content, and code whose only value was learning what not to do do not.

Workflow

  1. Read the current plan, any lessons or re0-memo notes, local domain notes, QA evidence, and any user complaint that triggered the restart.
  2. Identify what to preserve: contracts, schemas that survived QA, quality gates, vocabulary, reusable services, real-surface tests, and negative corpus.
  3. Identify what to discard: explanatory UI, debug panels, scaffold, shallow generated content, accidental abstractions, and code whose only value was learning what not to do.
  4. Name the first quality gate before planning code.
  5. Write a v0 skeleton plan with one complete vertical loop.
  6. Build only the first loop until it clears the gate.

Rules

  • Starting from scratch means no copy-forward unless the artifact earned it.
  • One complete vertical loop beats many shallow surfaces.
  • Preserve provenance in local docs, not in the shipped product.
  • Do not rebuild around a vague lesson. Turn it into a gate or leave it out.
  • Do not delete negative corpus; archive or reference it where the next cycle will see it.
  • If a reusable module survives, name the contract that proved it survives.

Verification

Before finishing:

  1. The preserve/discard split is explicit and evidence-backed.
  2. The new v0 plan has one complete vertical loop and a named first gate.
  3. No old architecture is copied forward merely because it exists.
  4. A fresh builder can start without rereading the failed codebase.

Verwandte Aufgaben

aus demselben Repository

Weitere Skills

Alle Skills
lilmgenius
Community

aim

When data lands with a thin ask — files, a repo, a paste, a chat scrollback — read it and propose what the user is trying to do with it, as a proposal to confirm rather than a question to answer. Use the moment material arrives without a fully-formed ask, or when the ask reads thinner than the data suggests.

Installationen / 1h
1
GitHub Stars
1300
Aktualisiert
20. Okt.
lilmgenius
Community

detool

Make durable artifacts portable by replacing incidental stack, vendor, model, CLI, path, quota, or harness nouns with the mechanism they mean, while keeping provenance, runbooks, and tool-subject claims concrete.

Installationen / 1h
1
GitHub Stars
1300
Aktualisiert
20. Okt.
lilmgenius
Community

feynman

Press a decision you just made until you can explain it to a skeptic in your own words, or surface the gap where you can't. The Feynman test aimed at a choice: understanding is cheapest to fake the moment after you decide, so a fresh critic presses for what you can't actually explain. Use right after picking an option, especially one an agent laid out without arguing for.

Installationen / 1h
1
GitHub Stars
1300
Aktualisiert
20. Okt.
lilmgenius
Community

hate

Attack a plan, design, or argument like you want it to fail before you commit real effort — return the single load-bearing objection and the cheapest experiment that would prove it matters, not a checklist. User-invoked on purpose: a hate-it reflex always in the agent's reach would bias it toward demolition. Weighs many failure axes but owns the synthesis to one root.

Installationen / 1h
1
GitHub Stars
1300
Aktualisiert
20. Okt.