lilmgenius/paperthin

re0-work

Restart a project or artifact from v0 while preserving only proven lessons, contracts, gates, vocabulary, real-surface tests, and negative corpus.

ソースを見る

使い方

  1. インストールコマンドをコピーし、自分の環境へ導入する前にソースを確認します。
  2. 必要なツール、認証情報、対応環境を原文で確認します。
  3. 入力と成果物を指定し、出力を資料と照合します。
npx skills add https://github.com/lilmgenius/paperthin --skill re0-work

開始前の確認

  • 導入にはモデル契約、API枠、ファイルへのアクセス許可は含まれません。
  • スター数や導入数は活動の指標であり、独立した品質・安全性試験ではありません。
リポジトリの原文

見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。

Start over from what the previous cycle proved, not from what it happened to build.

Goal

re0-work is a controlled restart. It keeps earned knowledge and refuses to copy forward accidental architecture. Starting from scratch is not amnesia: contracts, schemas, vocabulary, real-surface tests, quality gates, and negative corpus survive when they earned it. Scaffold, explanatory UI, debug panels, shallow generated content, and code whose only value was learning what not to do do not.

Workflow

  1. Read the current plan, any lessons or re0-memo notes, local domain notes, QA evidence, and any user complaint that triggered the restart.
  2. Identify what to preserve: contracts, schemas that survived QA, quality gates, vocabulary, reusable services, real-surface tests, and negative corpus.
  3. Identify what to discard: explanatory UI, debug panels, scaffold, shallow generated content, accidental abstractions, and code whose only value was learning what not to do.
  4. Name the first quality gate before planning code.
  5. Write a v0 skeleton plan with one complete vertical loop.
  6. Build only the first loop until it clears the gate.

Rules

  • Starting from scratch means no copy-forward unless the artifact earned it.
  • One complete vertical loop beats many shallow surfaces.
  • Preserve provenance in local docs, not in the shipped product.
  • Do not rebuild around a vague lesson. Turn it into a gate or leave it out.
  • Do not delete negative corpus; archive or reference it where the next cycle will see it.
  • If a reusable module survives, name the contract that proved it survives.

Verification

Before finishing:

  1. The preserve/discard split is explicit and evidence-backed.
  2. The new v0 plan has one complete vertical loop and a named first gate.
  3. No old architecture is copied forward merely because it exists.
  4. A fresh builder can start without rereading the failed codebase.

タスクに関連する項目

同じリポジトリから

関連する Skills

すべての Skills
lilmgenius
コミュニティ

aim

When data lands with a thin ask — files, a repo, a paste, a chat scrollback — read it and propose what the user is trying to do with it, as a proposal to confirm rather than a question to answer. Use the moment material arrives without a fully-formed ask, or when the ask reads thinner than the data suggests.

1時間の導入数
1
GitHub Stars
1300
更新日
10月20日
lilmgenius
コミュニティ

detool

Make durable artifacts portable by replacing incidental stack, vendor, model, CLI, path, quota, or harness nouns with the mechanism they mean, while keeping provenance, runbooks, and tool-subject claims concrete.

1時間の導入数
1
GitHub Stars
1300
更新日
10月20日
lilmgenius
コミュニティ

feynman

Press a decision you just made until you can explain it to a skeptic in your own words, or surface the gap where you can't. The Feynman test aimed at a choice: understanding is cheapest to fake the moment after you decide, so a fresh critic presses for what you can't actually explain. Use right after picking an option, especially one an agent laid out without arguing for.

1時間の導入数
1
GitHub Stars
1300
更新日
10月20日
lilmgenius
コミュニティ

hate

Attack a plan, design, or argument like you want it to fail before you commit real effort — return the single load-bearing objection and the cheapest experiment that would prove it matters, not a checklist. User-invoked on purpose: a hate-it reflex always in the agent's reach would bias it toward demolition. Weighs many failure axes but owns the synthesis to one root.

1時間の導入数
1
GitHub Stars
1300
更新日
10月20日