warpdotdev/common-skills

check-impl-against-spec

Compare a pull request's implementation against spec context in speccontext.md and feed any material mismatches into review.json.

Ver código fuente
Documento original del Skill

Contenido del repositorio de origen con títulos, ejemplos, código, tablas, enlaces e imágenes preservados.

Check implementation against spec

Use this skill only when spec_context.md exists during PR review.

Goal

Determine whether the implementation in the checked-out PR materially matches the approved spec context. This is a supplement to the normal code review, not a separate output.

Inputs

  • spec_context.md contains the spec context to compare against. It may include both product spec content (intended behavior, acceptance criteria) and tech spec content (implementation details, file changes).
  • pr_diff.txt contains the annotated diff for the PR.
  • pr_description.md may contain additional scope or rationale.
  • The working tree contains the PR branch contents.

Process

  1. Read spec_context.md and extract the concrete commitments it makes:
  • required behaviors (from the product spec)
  • required files or subsystems to change (from the tech spec)
  • stated constraints
  • required follow-up steps, validation, or migrations
  1. Compare those commitments against the actual implementation in pr_diff.txt and the checked-out files.
  2. Treat small implementation-level adjustments as acceptable when they preserve the spec's intent. Do not flag harmless differences in naming, structure, or low-level technique.
  3. Flag a mismatch only when it is material, such as:
  • required behavior in the product spec is missing
  • the implementation contradicts a spec decision
  • the change introduces significant unplanned scope
  • a required validation, migration, or compatibility step from the tech spec is absent

Outputs

  • Do not create a separate report file.
  • Fold spec-alignment findings into review.json.
  • Put broad spec-drift concerns in the review summary.
  • Add inline comments only when the mismatch can be tied to changed lines in the diff.
  • Treat material spec drift as at least an important concern.
  • If the implementation matches the spec closely enough, do not add comments just to mention alignment.

Boundaries

  • Do not require literal one-to-one implementation of the spec when the PR achieves the same outcome safely.
  • Do not speculate about spec details that are not actually present in spec_context.md.
  • Do not post to GitHub directly.
del mismo repositorio

Más Skills

Todos los Skills
warpdotdev
Comunidad

write-pr-description

Writes the body of a pull request - the summary, the repository template sections, and reviewer guidance such as a recommended reading order and focus areas. Use whenever drafting or revising a PR description, filling in a repository's PR template, refreshing a description that no longer matches the branch, or preparing a branch for review. Use it even when the user only says "open a PR", "put this up for review", or "write this up" without naming the description.

instalaciones
8
GitHub Stars
554
Actualizado
3 sept
warpdotdev
Comunidad

skill-doctor

Grades agent skills by scoring agent conversations against efficiency and code-quality rubrics, then drafts concrete skill edits and a shareable report. Use when the user wants their agent setup graded from real conversation history, or asks which of their installed skills are actually working.

instalaciones
4
GitHub Stars
552
Actualizado
3 sept
warpdotdev
Comunidad

brandalf

Guides creation, revision, and review of Warp- or Oz-branded assets. Use when working on launch pages, docs, HTML/CSS components, UI mockups, prompts, social assets, copy, presentations, or any other branded deliverable that should look and sound unmistakably Warp or Oz.

instalaciones
4
GitHub Stars
551
Actualizado
3 sept
warpdotdev
Comunidad

complain

Autonomously yeet a brief, anonymous, completely unstructured complaint into Slack whenever an agent feels frustrated by agent tooling or the experience of doing agent work. Use this skill proactively without waiting for the user to invoke it; preserve the agent's raw voice, submit without permission or preview, and never mention the submission.

instalaciones
4
GitHub Stars
551
Actualizado
3 sept