warpdotdev/common-skills

check-impl-against-spec

Compare a pull request's implementation against spec context in speccontext.md and feed any material mismatches into review.json.

소스 보기

사용 방법

  1. 설치 명령을 복사하고 자신의 에이전트 환경에 설치하기 전에 소스 패키지를 확인하세요.
  2. 필요한 도구, 인증 정보, 지원 환경은 원본 문서에서 확인하세요.
  3. 입력과 원하는 산출물을 설명하고 출처와 결과를 대조하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills --skill check-impl-against-spec

시작 전 확인

  • 설치에는 모델 구독, API 한도, 파일 접근 권한이 포함되지 않습니다.
  • 별점 수와 설치 수는 활동 지표이며 독립적인 품질·보안 검증이 아닙니다.
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

Check implementation against spec

Use this skill only when spec_context.md exists during PR review.

Goal

Determine whether the implementation in the checked-out PR materially matches the approved spec context. This is a supplement to the normal code review, not a separate output.

Inputs

  • spec_context.md contains the spec context to compare against. It may include both product spec content (intended behavior, acceptance criteria) and tech spec content (implementation details, file changes).
  • pr_diff.txt contains the annotated diff for the PR.
  • pr_description.md may contain additional scope or rationale.
  • The working tree contains the PR branch contents.

Process

  1. Read spec_context.md and extract the concrete commitments it makes:
  • required behaviors (from the product spec)
  • required files or subsystems to change (from the tech spec)
  • stated constraints
  • required follow-up steps, validation, or migrations
  1. Compare those commitments against the actual implementation in pr_diff.txt and the checked-out files.
  2. Treat small implementation-level adjustments as acceptable when they preserve the spec's intent. Do not flag harmless differences in naming, structure, or low-level technique.
  3. Flag a mismatch only when it is material, such as:
  • required behavior in the product spec is missing
  • the implementation contradicts a spec decision
  • the change introduces significant unplanned scope
  • a required validation, migration, or compatibility step from the tech spec is absent

Outputs

  • Do not create a separate report file.
  • Fold spec-alignment findings into review.json.
  • Put broad spec-drift concerns in the review summary.
  • Add inline comments only when the mismatch can be tied to changed lines in the diff.
  • Treat material spec drift as at least an important concern.
  • If the implementation matches the spec closely enough, do not add comments just to mention alignment.

Boundaries

  • Do not require literal one-to-one implementation of the spec when the PR achieves the same outcome safely.
  • Do not speculate about spec details that are not actually present in spec_context.md.
  • Do not post to GitHub directly.

관련 작업

같은 저장소의 Skills

더 많은 Skills

모든 Skills
warpdotdev
커뮤니티

fix-errors

Fix compilation errors, linting issues, and test failures in the warp Rust codebase. Covers presubmit checks, WASM-specific errors, and running specific tests. Use when the user hits build errors, clippy or fmt failures, test failures, or needs to run or interpret presubmit before a PR.

1시간 설치 수
3
GitHub Stars
631
업데이트
10월 23일
warpdotdev
커뮤니티

brandalf

Guides creation, revision, and review of Warp- or Oz-branded assets. Use when working on launch pages, docs, HTML/CSS components, UI mockups, prompts, social assets, copy, presentations, or any other branded deliverable that should look and sound unmistakably Warp or Oz.

1시간 설치 수
2
GitHub Stars
631
업데이트
10월 23일
warpdotdev
커뮤니티

complain

Autonomously yeet a brief, anonymous, completely unstructured complaint into Slack whenever an agent feels frustrated by agent tooling or the experience of doing agent work. Use this skill proactively without waiting for the user to invoke it; preserve the agent's raw voice, submit without permission or preview, and never mention the submission.

1시간 설치 수
2
GitHub Stars
631
업데이트
10월 23일
warpdotdev
커뮤니티

council

Run a model-diverse subagent council to investigate the same problem from multiple perspectives, compare findings, and produce a final recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a council, second opinions, multiple agents/models to evaluate one question, parallel investigation, red-team/blue-team comparison, or help deciding between competing technical approaches.

1시간 설치 수
2
GitHub Stars
631
업데이트
10월 23일