lilmgenius/paperthin

hate

Attack a plan, design, or argument like you want it to fail before you commit real effort — return the single load-bearing objection and the cheapest experiment that would prove it matters, not a checklist.

ソースを見る

使い方

  1. インストールコマンドをコピーし、自分の環境へ導入する前にソースを確認します。
  2. 必要なツール、認証情報、対応環境を原文で確認します。
  3. 入力と成果物を指定し、出力を資料と照合します。
npx skills add https://github.com/lilmgenius/paperthin --skill hate

開始前の確認

  • 導入にはモデル契約、API枠、ファイルへのアクセス許可は含まれません。
  • スター数や導入数は活動の指標であり、独立した品質・安全性試験ではありません。
リポジトリの原文

見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。

Refuse to be nice to the plan — return the one objection that could kill it and the cheapest shot that proves it matters.

Goal

hate asks "what would someone who wants this to fail attack first?" (validity). It attacks the whole plan — not one fact or one line, but the load-bearing structure — and collapses the attack to a single root. The highest-value output is never a checklist — it's one objection plus the cheaper experiment hiding inside the elaborate plan.

Workflow

  1. Pin the load-bearing assumption(s) — what must hold for the whole thing to stand.
  2. Attack on whatever axes apply — the general ones first: a load-bearing fact that may be false, confabulation (a post-hoc story treated as ground truth), analogy-mistaken-for-isomorphism (structure assumed to transfer across domains where it doesn't), future-tense suture (the argument leans on a result that doesn't exist yet), and the sharpest — cites a principle but implements its opposite; and for empirical / research plans, leakage (no external ground-truth enters the validation independently) and statistical power / family-wise α (a true hypothesis auto-failing from uncorrected tests; a near-zero-power condition that rubber-stamps regardless of truth).
  3. Collapse the findings to the single root objection — the one whose failure makes the others moot.
  4. Find the first nail — the cheapest falsification of the load-bearing assumption: the check (in time / cost / sample) that could kill it before the expensive program runs.
  5. Return { root, first_nail } — not a list.

Rules

  • Attack, don't improve — improving is a different reflex.
  • Own the synthesis — many axes may fire, but collapse them to the single load-bearing root; return that, never a list.

Verification

Before finishing:

  1. The root is genuinely load-bearing — the plan falls without it.
  2. The first nail is genuinely cheaper than the plan it would pre-empt.

タスクに関連する項目

同じリポジトリから

関連する Skills

すべての Skills
lilmgenius
コミュニティ

aim

When data lands with a thin ask — files, a repo, a paste, a chat scrollback — read it and propose what the user is trying to do with it, as a proposal to confirm rather than a question to answer. Use the moment material arrives without a fully-formed ask, or when the ask reads thinner than the data suggests.

1時間の導入数
1
GitHub Stars
1300
更新日
10月20日
lilmgenius
コミュニティ

detool

Make durable artifacts portable by replacing incidental stack, vendor, model, CLI, path, quota, or harness nouns with the mechanism they mean, while keeping provenance, runbooks, and tool-subject claims concrete.

1時間の導入数
1
GitHub Stars
1300
更新日
10月20日
lilmgenius
コミュニティ

feynman

Press a decision you just made until you can explain it to a skeptic in your own words, or surface the gap where you can't. The Feynman test aimed at a choice: understanding is cheapest to fake the moment after you decide, so a fresh critic presses for what you can't actually explain. Use right after picking an option, especially one an agent laid out without arguing for.

1時間の導入数
1
GitHub Stars
1300
更新日
10月20日
lilmgenius
コミュニティ

macrothink

User-invoked read-only pass for checking whether the current direction is tunnel-visioned: strip the session's bait, fan out 2 to 5 same-model fresh reads, and report divergence first without treating convergence as proof.

1時間の導入数
1
GitHub Stars
1300
更新日
10月20日