lilmgenius/paperthin

hate

Attack a plan, design, or argument like you want it to fail before you commit real effort — return the single load-bearing objection and the cheapest experiment that would prove it matters, not a checklist.

소스 보기

사용 방법

  1. 설치 명령을 복사하고 자신의 에이전트 환경에 설치하기 전에 소스 패키지를 확인하세요.
  2. 필요한 도구, 인증 정보, 지원 환경은 원본 문서에서 확인하세요.
  3. 입력과 원하는 산출물을 설명하고 출처와 결과를 대조하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/lilmgenius/paperthin --skill hate

시작 전 확인

  • 설치에는 모델 구독, API 한도, 파일 접근 권한이 포함되지 않습니다.
  • 별점 수와 설치 수는 활동 지표이며 독립적인 품질·보안 검증이 아닙니다.
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

Refuse to be nice to the plan — return the one objection that could kill it and the cheapest shot that proves it matters.

Goal

hate asks "what would someone who wants this to fail attack first?" (validity). It attacks the whole plan — not one fact or one line, but the load-bearing structure — and collapses the attack to a single root. The highest-value output is never a checklist — it's one objection plus the cheaper experiment hiding inside the elaborate plan.

Workflow

  1. Pin the load-bearing assumption(s) — what must hold for the whole thing to stand.
  2. Attack on whatever axes apply — the general ones first: a load-bearing fact that may be false, confabulation (a post-hoc story treated as ground truth), analogy-mistaken-for-isomorphism (structure assumed to transfer across domains where it doesn't), future-tense suture (the argument leans on a result that doesn't exist yet), and the sharpest — cites a principle but implements its opposite; and for empirical / research plans, leakage (no external ground-truth enters the validation independently) and statistical power / family-wise α (a true hypothesis auto-failing from uncorrected tests; a near-zero-power condition that rubber-stamps regardless of truth).
  3. Collapse the findings to the single root objection — the one whose failure makes the others moot.
  4. Find the first nail — the cheapest falsification of the load-bearing assumption: the check (in time / cost / sample) that could kill it before the expensive program runs.
  5. Return { root, first_nail } — not a list.

Rules

  • Attack, don't improve — improving is a different reflex.
  • Own the synthesis — many axes may fire, but collapse them to the single load-bearing root; return that, never a list.

Verification

Before finishing:

  1. The root is genuinely load-bearing — the plan falls without it.
  2. The first nail is genuinely cheaper than the plan it would pre-empt.

관련 작업

같은 저장소의 Skills

더 많은 Skills

모든 Skills
lilmgenius
커뮤니티

aim

When data lands with a thin ask — files, a repo, a paste, a chat scrollback — read it and propose what the user is trying to do with it, as a proposal to confirm rather than a question to answer. Use the moment material arrives without a fully-formed ask, or when the ask reads thinner than the data suggests.

1시간 설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
1.3천
업데이트
10월 20일
lilmgenius
커뮤니티

detool

Make durable artifacts portable by replacing incidental stack, vendor, model, CLI, path, quota, or harness nouns with the mechanism they mean, while keeping provenance, runbooks, and tool-subject claims concrete.

1시간 설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
1.3천
업데이트
10월 20일
lilmgenius
커뮤니티

feynman

Press a decision you just made until you can explain it to a skeptic in your own words, or surface the gap where you can't. The Feynman test aimed at a choice: understanding is cheapest to fake the moment after you decide, so a fresh critic presses for what you can't actually explain. Use right after picking an option, especially one an agent laid out without arguing for.

1시간 설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
1.3천
업데이트
10월 20일
lilmgenius
커뮤니티

macrothink

User-invoked read-only pass for checking whether the current direction is tunnel-visioned: strip the session's bait, fan out 2 to 5 same-model fresh reads, and report divergence first without treating convergence as proof.

1시간 설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
1.3천
업데이트
10월 20일