mikubaka88/ccfa-skills

ccf-common

Shared governance for the CCFA family: routing, trigger registry, task modes, handoff modes, source registry, privacy/evidence policy, ccfa.yaml, and artifact contracts.

View source
Original skill document

Rendered from the source repository. Headings, examples, code, tables, links, and referenced images are preserved.

CCF Common

Core Rule

This is the shared control module for the CCFA Skills family. Do not use it as a user-facing research assistant module. Use it to keep routing, handoff behavior, source provenance, private-material handling, and score-risk language consistent across ccf-* skills and ccf-skill-forger.

Invocation Controls

CCFA Handoff Mode: PARTIAL (Recommended). Follow metadata.ccf_skill_controls.handoff_question_mode and references/handoff-modes.md. This skill provides shared policy only; route ordinary research tasks to the owning skill in references/routing.md.

Shared Controls

Load only the file needed for the current maintenance task:

  • references/routing.md: Use to resolve which CCFA skill owns a request and to avoid trigger overlap.
  • references/task-modes.md: Use to interpret quick and standard execution modes across CCFA skills.
  • references/review-output-standards.md: Use to keep numeric scoring, multi-reviewer panels, score-change conditions, and visible output quality consistent.
  • references/handoff-modes.md: Use to interpret metadata.ccf_skill_controls.handoff_question_mode.
  • references/privacy-and-evidence.md: Use when handling manuscripts, reviews, rebuttals, private drafts, literature searches, or evidence claims.
  • references/source-registry.yaml: Use as the shared source inventory for venue rules, review methods, exemplar records, and research-workflow references.
  • references/ccf-a-venue-map.md: Use when a non-writing skill needs venue-family mapping without depending on ccf-paper-writer.
  • references/skill-trigger-registry.yaml: Use as the v0.4 public trigger registry for routing conflict audits.
  • references/artifact-contracts.md: Use whenever a skill creates or revises files; it defines ownership, canonical paths, overwrite-in-place defaults, and the narrow cases that require retained history.
  • references/ccfa-yaml-contract.md: Use for the shared ccfa.yaml project-state schema.

Maintenance Workflow

  1. When editing any CCFA family skill, preserve the metadata.ccf_skill_controls block and keep its keys aligned with references/handoff-modes.md.
  2. Use references/routing.md before adding new trigger language to prevent overlapping ownership.
  3. Use references/task-modes.md before changing checklist strictness, quick polishing, standard review, or output contracts.
  4. Use references/review-output-standards.md before changing scorecards, reviewer panels, score-risk language, or final output self-check rules.
  5. Use references/privacy-and-evidence.md before adding any browsing, citation, novelty, scoring, experiment-result, compression, or rebuttal instruction.
  6. Use references/artifact-contracts.md before changing generated filenames, revision behavior, report folders, caches, attempt archives, or ledgers. Default to one canonical artifact per deliverable and update it in place.
  7. Never commit personal absolute paths, usernames, expanded home directories, private local skill roots, or machine-specific command examples. Use $CODEX_HOME, $HOME, repo-relative paths, or non-identifying placeholders.
  8. Put new public sources in references/source-registry.yaml; do not duplicate long URL lists in sibling source-notes.md files. Local references must use repo-relative or non-identifying local:/repo: identifiers, not machine paths.
  9. Run scripts/check_sources.py after source-registry edits. The script reports issues only and must not rewrite registry files.
  10. Run scripts/check_path_privacy.py before finalizing CCFA-family changes that touch docs, examples, source records, scripts, diagrams, or release files.

Output Contract

When auditing or updating CCFA skills, report:

text
Routing impact:
Handoff mode impact:
Private-material safety:
Source-registry changes:
Score-risk language changes:
Validation result:
from this repository

More skills

All skills
mikubaka88
Community

ccf-experiment-designer

Own experiment evidence semantics: decide datasets, baselines, metrics, ablations, robustness tests, chart evidence, and exactly what rows or columns a result table should contain. Use for experiment design, benchmark planning, supplied-result evidence structure, result-table schema, chart-spec semantics, 设计实验, 对比实验, 消融, 结果表证据结构. Do not search literature as the main deliverable, visually beautify or render an already specified table/figure, improve layout/colors/readability, or invent results.

installs
5
GitHub stars
2 tys.
Updated
13 sie
mikubaka88
Community

ccf-humanization

Humanize and de-defend publication-facing CCF/AI prose and artifacts as a sidecar preflight, never as the primary task owner. Use before manuscript drafting/revision and before final manuscript experiment text, tables, captions, or method descriptions when Codex must remove defensive writing, boilerplate disclaimers, repetitive improbable edge cases, unnecessary safeguards, generic SHA-256/checksum requirements, duplicated smoke tests, simplified/toy methods, or AI-like risk narration. Do not auto-load as the sole owner for raw experiment planning, retrieval, review, auditing, routing, visual rendering, or assessment-only tasks without publication prose. Keep necessary concerns in a separate user-review warning instead of silently injecting them into files. Do not conceal material evidence, fabricate results, or override venue-mandated disclosures.

installs
5
GitHub stars
2 tys.
Updated
13 sie
mikubaka88
Community

ccf-idea-optimizer

Turn rough CCF research directions into concrete problem, gap, insight, method, novelty, and evidence plans. Use for idea optimization, fuzzy idea concretization, develop a fuzzy idea with no score, research direction shaping, early direction exploration, salvage routes, 优化idea, 具象化idea, 研究思路优化, 找方向, 方向探索. Do not rank or score multiple ideas as the main output.

installs
5
GitHub stars
2 tys.
Updated
13 sie
mikubaka88
Community

ccf-idea-reviewer

Strictly score, rank, compare, and triage early CCF research ideas with prior-art awareness and venue-fit risk. Use only for explicit idea scoring, score and rank multiple ideas, idea ranking, idea review, acceptance-potential triage, idea评分, 选题评分, 选题排名, 严格评审. Do not polish manuscripts, brainstorm directions, develop a fuzzy idea with no score, or optimize a single idea unless scoring is explicit.

installs
5
GitHub stars
2 tys.
Updated
13 sie