anthropics/claude-for-legal

investigation-query

Ask questions against an open investigation log — what witnesses said, where accounts conflict, what gaps exist, what the strongest evidence is on each issue.

Quelltext ansehen

Verwendung

  1. Installationsbefehl kopieren und das Quellpaket vor der Installation in der eigenen Agentenumgebung prüfen.
  2. Benötigte Werkzeuge, Zugangsdaten und Hosts im Original prüfen.
  3. Eingabe und gewünschtes Ergebnis beschreiben und die Ausgabe mit den Quellen abgleichen.
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/claude-for-legal --skill investigation-query

Vor dem Start

  • Die Installation umfasst weder Modellabo noch API-Kontingent oder Dateizugriffsrechte.
  • Sterne und Installationen zeigen Aktivität, keine unabhängige Qualitäts- oder Sicherheitsprüfung.
Originales Skill-Dokument

Aus dem Quell-Repository gerendert; Überschriften, Beispiele, Code, Tabellen, Links und Bilder bleiben erhalten.

/investigation-query

Answers questions against the investigation log — what witnesses said, where accounts conflict, what gaps exist, what the strongest evidence is on each issue.

Instructions

  1. Load the internal-investigation reference skill and run Mode 3 (Query).
  2. Always cite log entry IDs in the answer.
  3. If the log contains nothing relevant to the question, say so explicitly —

"I have not seen any information on [topic] in this investigation log ([N] entries reviewed)" — and offer to flag it as a gap.

Examples

/employment-legal:investigation-query [matter name]
What did the respondent say about the December team dinner?
/employment-legal:investigation-query [matter name]
Where do the complainant's and respondent's accounts conflict?
/employment-legal:investigation-query [matter name]
What do we still need?
Detailed log-query process, citation rules, and gap-flagging templates live in the internal-investigation reference skill — load it before doing substantive work.

Verwandte Aufgaben

aus demselben Repository

Weitere Skills

Alle Skills
anthropics
Offiziell

marketing-claims-review

Review marketing copy for claims that need substantiation, reframing, or cutting. Use when the user says "review this marketing copy", "check these claims", "can we say this", "is this puffery or a problem", or pastes marketing content (landing pages, emails, ads, taglines).

Installationen
1
GitHub Stars
9752
Aktualisiert
14. Okt.
anthropics
Offiziell

amendment-history

Trace how a contract has changed across its base agreement and all amendments — either a summary of all changes over time, or a provision trace for a specific clause. Use when the user says "what changed in this contract over time", "show me the amendment history", "where's the latest [clause]", "how has [provision] evolved", or uploads multiple versions of an agreement.

Installationen
1
GitHub Stars
9488
Aktualisiert
21. Aug.
anthropics
Offiziell

auto-updater

Check installed community skills for updates. Shows a diff and requires explicit approval before applying. Use when the user says "check for updates", "update my skills", "anything new for my installed skills", or when invoked from the registry-sync agent.

Installationen
1
GitHub Stars
9488
Aktualisiert
21. Aug.
anthropics
Offiziell

brief-section-drafter

Draft a brief section in house style, consistent with the case theory — every fact cited, every case checked, every argument tied to the theory. Use when the user says "draft the [section]", "write the statement of facts", "argument section on [issue]", or needs a first draft of a brief section.

Installationen
1
GitHub Stars
9488
Aktualisiert
21. Aug.