anthropics/claude-for-legal

investigation-query

Ask questions against an open investigation log — what witnesses said, where accounts conflict, what gaps exist, what the strongest evidence is on each issue.

Ver código fuente

Cómo usar

  1. Copia el comando y revisa el paquete antes de instalarlo en tu entorno de agente.
  2. Consulta las herramientas, credenciales y entornos necesarios en el documento original.
  3. Describe las entradas y el resultado deseado; contrasta la salida con las fuentes.
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/claude-for-legal --skill investigation-query

Antes de empezar

  • La instalación no incluye suscripción al modelo, cuota API ni permisos sobre tus archivos.
  • Las estrellas e instalaciones reflejan actividad, no una prueba independiente de calidad o seguridad.
Documento original del Skill

Contenido del repositorio de origen con títulos, ejemplos, código, tablas, enlaces e imágenes preservados.

/investigation-query

Answers questions against the investigation log — what witnesses said, where accounts conflict, what gaps exist, what the strongest evidence is on each issue.

Instructions

  1. Load the internal-investigation reference skill and run Mode 3 (Query).
  2. Always cite log entry IDs in the answer.
  3. If the log contains nothing relevant to the question, say so explicitly —

"I have not seen any information on [topic] in this investigation log ([N] entries reviewed)" — and offer to flag it as a gap.

Examples

/employment-legal:investigation-query [matter name]
What did the respondent say about the December team dinner?
/employment-legal:investigation-query [matter name]
Where do the complainant's and respondent's accounts conflict?
/employment-legal:investigation-query [matter name]
What do we still need?
Detailed log-query process, citation rules, and gap-flagging templates live in the internal-investigation reference skill — load it before doing substantive work.

Relacionados por tarea

del mismo repositorio

Más Skills

Todos los Skills
anthropics
Oficial

marketing-claims-review

Review marketing copy for claims that need substantiation, reframing, or cutting. Use when the user says "review this marketing copy", "check these claims", "can we say this", "is this puffery or a problem", or pastes marketing content (landing pages, emails, ads, taglines).

instalaciones
1
GitHub Stars
9,8 mil
Actualizado
14 oct
anthropics
Oficial

amendment-history

Trace how a contract has changed across its base agreement and all amendments — either a summary of all changes over time, or a provision trace for a specific clause. Use when the user says "what changed in this contract over time", "show me the amendment history", "where's the latest [clause]", "how has [provision] evolved", or uploads multiple versions of an agreement.

instalaciones
1
GitHub Stars
9,5 mil
Actualizado
21 ago
anthropics
Oficial

auto-updater

Check installed community skills for updates. Shows a diff and requires explicit approval before applying. Use when the user says "check for updates", "update my skills", "anything new for my installed skills", or when invoked from the registry-sync agent.

instalaciones
1
GitHub Stars
9,5 mil
Actualizado
21 ago
anthropics
Oficial

brief-section-drafter

Draft a brief section in house style, consistent with the case theory — every fact cited, every case checked, every argument tied to the theory. Use when the user says "draft the [section]", "write the statement of facts", "argument section on [issue]", or needs a first draft of a brief section.

instalaciones
1
GitHub Stars
9,5 mil
Actualizado
21 ago