getsentry/skills

iterate-pr

Iterate on a PR until actionable CI passes and high/medium review feedback is addressed.

View source
Original skill document

Rendered from the source repository. Headings, examples, code, tables, links, and referenced images are preserved.

Iterate on PR Until CI Passes

Goal: fix actionable CI failures and high/medium review feedback. Stop and report human approval, draft-readiness, and merge-readiness gates.

Requires:

  • authenticated gh
  • uv
  • target repository root as cwd
  • skill-root-relative script paths, for example scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py

Bundled Scripts

ScriptRunOutput
scripts/fetch_pr_checks.pyuv run scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py [--pr NUMBER]JSON: pr, summary, checks, failure snippets
scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.pyuv run scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.py [--pr NUMBER]JSON buckets: high, medium, low, bot, resolved
scripts/monitor_pr_checks.pyuv run scripts/monitor_pr_checks.py [--pr NUMBER]terminal marker plus tab-separated checks
scripts/reply_to_thread.pyuv run scripts/reply_to_thread.py THREAD_ID BODY [...]JSON reply results

Check summary fields include failed, pending, actionable_pending, and human_gate_pending.

Monitor markers:

  • ALL_CHECKS_PASSED
  • CHECKS_DONE_WITH_FAILURES
  • NO_CHECKS_REGISTERED
  • DRAFT_PR_WITH_NO_CHECKS
  • CHECKS_BLOCKED_BY_REVIEW_GATE

Workflow

1. Identify PR

Run:

bash
gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName,isDraft,reviewDecision

Stop when:

  • no PR exists
  • draft PR has no checks after monitor grace period: report DRAFT_PR_WITH_NO_CHECKS

Draft rule: inspect existing checks/feedback only. Do not mark ready for review unless asked.

2. Handle Feedback

Run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.py [--pr NUMBER].

BucketAction
highfix
mediumfix
lowask user which to address
botskip informational comments
resolvedskip

Feedback fix checklist:

  • verify root cause
  • search related code
  • fix all instances
  • for review_bot: true: fix real issues, explain false positives

Low-priority prompt format:

text
Found 3 low-priority suggestions:
1. [l] "Consider renaming this variable" - @reviewer in api.py:42
2. [nit] "Could use a list comprehension" - @reviewer in utils.py:18
3. [style] "Add a docstring" - @reviewer in models.py:55

Which should I address? ("1,3", "all", or "none")

3. Check CI Status

Run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py [--pr NUMBER].

StateAction
failed > 0 and actionable_pending == 0fix failures
actionable_pending > 0wait; poll feedback while waiting
pending > 0 and actionable_pending == 0report CHECKS_BLOCKED_BY_REVIEW_GATE
no checks after grace periodreport NO_CHECKS_REGISTERED or DRAFT_PR_WITH_NO_CHECKS
all actionable checks passedrun post-CI feedback check

Wait for actionable review bots: sentry, warden, cursor, bugbot, seer, codeql. Do not wait for approval, isDraft, REVIEW_REQUIRED, Codecov, or informational bots.

4. Fix CI Failures

For each failure:

  1. read full log: gh run view <run-id> --log-failed
  2. trace from assertion/exception/lint rule to source
  3. state the cause before editing: "fails because X, affected by Y"
  4. search related call sites/patterns
  5. fix root cause, not symptom
  6. add focused test coverage when needed

5. Verify Locally, Then Commit and Push

Before commit:

  • test fix: rerun specific test
  • lint/type fix: rerun affected checker
  • code fix: rerun covering tests
  • local failure: fix before pushing
bash
git add <files>
git commit -m "fix: <descriptive message>"
git push

6. Monitor CI and Address Feedback

Loop:

  1. run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_checks.py
  2. handle table in step 3
  3. while actionable_pending > 0, run uv run scripts/fetch_pr_feedback.py
  4. fix new high/medium feedback immediately
  5. if changed, verify, commit, push, restart loop
  6. otherwise sleep 30 seconds and repeat
  7. after checks pass, wait 10 seconds, fetch feedback once more
  8. if new high/medium feedback exists, return to step 4

Claude Code optional: run uv run scripts/monitor_pr_checks.py through MonitorTool with persistent: false; set timeout to normal repo CI duration. Restart the monitor after every push.

Exit Conditions

ExitConditions
Successactionable CI passed; post-CI feedback clean; low-priority choice handled
Ask usersame failure after 2 attempts; feedback unclear; infrastructure issue
Stopno PR; branch needs rebase; no checks; draft no-checks; only human gates remain

Fallback

If scripts fail, use gh CLI directly:

  • gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName,isDraft,reviewDecision
  • gh pr checks --json name,state,bucket,description,link
  • gh run view <run-id> --log-failed
  • gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{number}/comments
from this repository

More skills

All skills
getsentry
Official

security-review

Security code review for vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "security review", "find vulnerabilities", "check for security issues", "audit security", "OWASP review", or review code for injection, XSS, authentication, authorization, cryptography issues. Provides systematic review with confidence-based reporting.

installs
5
GitHub stars
983
Updated
Sep 7
getsentry
Official

gha-security-review

GitHub Actions security review for workflow exploitation vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "review GitHub Actions", "audit workflows", "check CI security", "GHA security", "workflow security review", or review .github/workflows/ for pwn requests, expression injection, credential theft, and supply chain attacks. Exploitation-focused with concrete PoC scenarios.

installs
1
GitHub stars
979
Updated
Aug 25
getsentry
Official

prompt-optimizer

Creates, optimizes, and iteratively refines agent prompts, system prompts, developer prompts, and reusable prompt templates. Use when asked to improve a prompt, optimize a system prompt, rewrite an agent prompt, tune prompt wording, make a prompt more reliable, port prompts between OpenAI, Claude, or Gemini, or build prompt evals.

installs
3
GitHub stars
974
Updated
Aug 25
getsentry
Official

blog-writing-guide

Write, review, and improve blog posts for the Sentry engineering blog following Sentry's specific writing standards, voice, and quality bar. Use this skill whenever someone asks to write a blog post, draft a technical article, review blog content, improve a draft, write a product announcement, create an engineering deep-dive, or produce any written content destined for the Sentry blog or developer audience. Also trigger when the user mentions "blog post," "blog draft," "write-up," "announcement post," "engineering post," "deep dive," "postmortem," or asks for help with technical writing for Sentry. Even if the user just says "help me write about [feature/topic]" — if it sounds like it could become a Sentry blog post, use this skill.

installs
2
GitHub stars
974
Updated
Aug 25