millionco/react-doctor

rule-research

Define a precise React Doctor rule contract before implementation.

View source

How to use

  1. Copy the installation command and review the source package before installing it in your own agent environment.
  2. Check the source document for required tools, credentials and supported hosts.
  3. Describe your input and desired deliverable; review the output against the source material.
npx skills add https://github.com/millionco/react-doctor --skill rule-research

Before you start

  • Installation does not include a model subscription, API allowance or permission to access your files.
  • Repository stars and installation counts describe activity, not an independent quality or security test.
Original skill document

Rendered from the source repository. Headings, examples, code, tables, links, and referenced images are preserved.

Research a rule

Produce a rule contract that rule-writing can implement without guessing.

Define the behavior

Resolve only questions that affect correctness:

  • Which code pattern should report?
  • Which runtime behavior makes it harmful?
  • Which similar code must stay quiet?
  • Does detection need syntax, scope, or path analysis?
  • Which imported, dynamic, type-driven, or interprocedural cases stay out of scope?

If the user requested implementation, make the contract concise and continue.

Collect evidence

  1. Define the rule in one sentence: This rule catches <pattern> that causes <problem>.
  2. Explain the runtime reason.
  3. Inspect nearby rules, tests, utilities, and the generated registry.
  4. Use truffler before proposing a new detector or helper:
sh
   bunx @rayhanadev/truffler "<symbol-or-behavior>" \
     packages/oxlint-plugin-react-doctor/src/plugin \
     --kind function,interface,type,constant --limit 20
  1. Gather official documentation, implementation notes, related linter behavior, and open-source examples.
  2. Separate strong positives, adjacent patterns, valid traps, and unsupported cases.
  3. Choose syntax-only, scope-aware, or path-aware detection.

Use rde-eval when a bounded open-source sample could change the contract. Leave final pull request parity to rule-validate.

Write the contract

Return:

md
Rule definition:
<pattern and specific problem>

Runtime reason:
<short explanation>

Detector precision:
<syntax-only, scope-aware, or path-aware>

Evidence:

- <source and implication>

Strong positives:

- <reportable examples>

False-positive traps:

- <valid examples>

In scope:

- <supported cases>

Out of scope:

- <explicit boundaries>

Test seeds:

- <invalid and valid fixtures>

Open questions:

- <correctness blockers only>

Treat false positives as correctness bugs. Keep the diagnostic narrower than or equal to the proven behavior. Split adjacent ideas into separate rules.

Related by task

from this repository

More skills

All skills
millionco
Community

react-doctor

Use when finishing a feature, fixing a bug, before committing React code, or when the user types /doctor, asks to scan, triage, or clean up React diagnostics. Covers lint, accessibility, bundle size, architecture. Includes a regression check and a full local-triage workflow that fetches the canonical playbook.

installs
27
GitHub stars
15K
Updated
Oct 16
millionco
Community

run-parity

Compare React Doctor diagnostics for a GitHub pull request (PR) with Vercel Sandbox. Use when asked to run parity, check a PR for diagnostic regressions, compare a PR with its base, or report added and removed diagnostics.

installs
1
GitHub stars
15K
Updated
Oct 14
millionco
Community

improve-react

Survey a whole React codebase as a senior React engineer, using React Doctor's scan as evidence, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the React code", "audit this codebase", "make this app faster / more robust", or wants a roadmap of fixes rather than a review of a single diff. For a regression check or a

installs
1
GitHub stars
14.9K
Updated
Oct 1
millionco
Community

benchmark-fp-fn-audit

Audit React Doctor against ReactBench or similar diagnostic benchmark corpora for confirmed false positives, false negatives, taxonomy gaps, and verifier artifacts. Use when analyzing rd.log, rd-before.json, rd-after.json, model.patch, result.json, reward/test logs, rule distributions, or when asked to perform a second adversarial pass over React Doctor benchmark findings.

installs
2
GitHub stars
14.7K
Updated
Sep 2