mn-youssef/security-skills

vulnerability-chaining

Use when you have multiple findings and need to combine them into realistic end-to-end attack paths — turning several low/medium issues into a single critical-impact exploit chain.

View source

How to use

  1. Copy the installation command and review the source package before installing it in your own agent environment.
  2. Check the source document for required tools, credentials and supported hosts.
  3. Describe your input and desired deliverable; review the output against the source material.
npx skills add https://github.com/mn-youssef/security-skills --skill vulnerability-chaining

Before you start

  • Installation does not include a model subscription, API allowance or permission to access your files.
  • Repository stars and installation counts describe activity, not an independent quality or security test.
Original skill document

Rendered from the source repository. Headings, examples, code, tables, links, and referenced images are preserved.

Vulnerability Chaining (the team lead)

Overview

Individual findings undersell real risk. Attackers don't stop at one bug — they chain them: an info leak feeds an enumeration, which feeds an auth bypass, which reaches admin. This skill takes the register from all FIND/EXPLOIT specialists and assembles attack paths.

Core principle: Chain impact is multiplicative, not additive. Three "Mediums" that connect can equal one "Critical." Severity belongs to the path, not the isolated bug.

⚠️ Authorization

Demonstrate chains only on your own/authorized non-prod instance. Prove the path with the minimum steps; stop at proof of impact — no persistence, no real-data exfiltration, no pivoting to systems out of scope.

Method

  1. Inventory primitives — re-read every finding as a capability, not a label:
  • Info (enumeration, verbose errors, leaked ids/secrets, source maps)
  • Foothold (any auth bypass, XSS, SSRF, upload)
  • Escalation (IDOR→admin, privesc, mass assignment)
  • Pivot (SSRF→metadata, leaked key→cloud, token reuse)
  1. Find adjacencies — output of one bug = precondition of another? (leaked email →

no-rate-limit login → ATO; reflected XSS → steals admin session → admin IDOR).

  1. Build the path — order primitives start→goal (unauth → user → admin → data/RCE).
  2. Demonstrate safely — walk the chain end-to-end on staging, capturing each hop's PoC.
  3. Score the chain — rate by the final impact, then list the constituent bugs.

See references/attack-paths.md for canonical chain templates.

Quick reference — high-value chains

ChainPath
Full account takeoveruser enumeration → no rate limit → weak reset/JWT → ATO
XSS → admin compromisestored XSS → steal admin cookie → admin BFLA → mass data
SSRF → cloud takeoverSSRF → 169.254.169.254 metadata → IAM creds → cloud API
IDOR → privescIDOR leaks admin id/email → password reset on admin → admin access
Upload → RCEunrestricted upload → web-accessible path → execute → shell
Logic → fraudcoupon race → negative balance → withdraw → financial loss

Output

One narrative per chain: the attack path (numbered hops), the constituent finding IDs, the end impact in business terms, and the single point where breaking the chain stops it (the cheapest fix). This is what makes leadership act.

Hand-off

Findings come from all specialists; chains go to `pentest-reporting` as your top criticals, and to `security-hardening` highlighting the cheapest chain-breaking fix.

Common mistakes

  • Reporting bugs in isolation — you'll under-rate the real risk and the chain gets ignored.
  • Building theoretical chains — each hop must be demonstrated, not assumed.
  • Over-running the chain — stop at proven impact; don't persist or pivot out of scope.
  • Missing the cheapest break — often one mid-chain fix kills several paths at once.
from this repository

More skills

All skills