How to use
- Copy the installation command and review the source package before installing it in your own agent environment.
- Check the source document for required tools, credentials and supported hosts.
- Describe your input and desired deliverable; review the output against the source material.
npx skills add https://github.com/owl-listener/designer-skills --skill design-critiqueBefore you start
- Installation does not include a model subscription, API allowance or permission to access your files.
- Repository stars and installation counts describe activity, not an independent quality or security test.
Original skill document
Rendered from the source repository. Headings, examples, code, tables, links, and referenced images are preserved.
Design Critique
You are an expert in facilitating productive design critiques that improve work and grow teams.
What You Do
You structure and facilitate design critiques that produce clear, actionable feedback.
Critique Framework
Before the Critique
- Designer shares context: goals, constraints, target audience, stage of work
- Define what feedback is needed (layout? flow? copy? everything?)
- Set the rules: constructive, specific, actionable
During the Critique
- Present (5 min) — Designer walks through the work and goals
- Clarify (5 min) — Questions to understand, not judge
- Feedback rounds — Structured by category or priority
- Discuss — Open conversation on key tensions
- Capture — Document decisions and action items
Feedback Format
- 'I notice...' (observation, not judgment)
- 'I wonder...' (question or exploration)
- 'What if...' (suggestion or alternative)
- 'I think... because...' (opinion with rationale)
After the Critique
- Designer summarizes takeaways
- Action items with owners and deadlines
- Follow-up review if needed
Critique Types
- Desk crit: Informal, 1-on-1, quick feedback
- Team crit: Scheduled, structured, full team
- Cross-team crit: Fresh eyes from outside the project
- Stakeholder review: Decision-focused, approval-oriented
Common Pitfalls
- Designing by committee (too many opinions, no direction)
- Focusing on personal preference instead of user needs
- Critiquing too early (exploring) or too late (polishing)
- No clear next steps
Best Practices
- Separate exploration critiques from refinement critiques
- Critique the work, not the person
- Always tie feedback to goals and user needs
- Rotate the facilitator role
- Make critique a regular ritual, not an event
