Cómo usar
- Copia el comando y revisa el paquete antes de instalarlo en tu entorno de agente.
- Consulta las herramientas, credenciales y entornos necesarios en el documento original.
- Describe las entradas y el resultado deseado; contrasta la salida con las fuentes.
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill collect-independent-judgmentsAntes de empezar
- La instalación no incluye suscripción al modelo, cuota API ni permisos sobre tus archivos.
- Las estrellas e instalaciones reflejan actividad, no una prueba independiente de calidad o seguridad.
Documento original del Skill
Contenido del repositorio de origen con títulos, ejemplos, código, tablas, enlaces e imágenes preservados.
collect-independent-judgments
Purpose
Collect blinded judgments from genuinely independent evaluators or perspectives before exposing peer outputs.
Input contract
yaml
required: [judgment_prompt, evaluator_roster, candidate_set, independence_rules]
optional: [rubric, response_deadline, abstention_policy]
constraints: [evaluators receive no peer judgments; each ballot preserves rationale and provenance]Procedure
- Freeze the candidate set, rubric, prompt, and independence rules before collection.
- Obtain one sealed judgment and rationale per evaluator, recording abstentions and unavailable evidence.
- Check for shared data, model, prompt, or deliberation leakage before unblinding.
- Unblind only after collection, then return ballots, independence flags, and an aggregation-ready dataset.
If independent judgments are complete and their provenance is preserved, consider aggregate-ranking as the next tactic.
Output contract
yaml
produces: [sealed_ballots, independence_audit, rationale_set, aggregation_dataset]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]Quality gates
- A-class gate: declared universe = all commissioned evaluator ballots; numerator = ballots complete, provenance-linked, and leakage-free; batch increment = one sealed ballot; stopping reason = roster exhausted or a declared quorum reached with all exclusions documented; source references = evaluator, prompt, data, and ballot IDs; direction/threshold reason = independence confidence decreases with shared inputs or peer exposure.
- No aggregation before the leakage check is complete.
Failure and counterexamples
Do not count multiple roles using the same evidence as independent judgments. An abstention is a recorded outcome, not a missing pass.
Provenance map
- resolved: collective-adjudication
