How to use
- Copy the installation command and review the source package before installing it in your own agent environment.
- Check the source document for required tools, credentials and supported hosts.
- Describe your input and desired deliverable; review the output against the source material.
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill collect-independent-judgmentsBefore you start
- Installation does not include a model subscription, API allowance or permission to access your files.
- Repository stars and installation counts describe activity, not an independent quality or security test.
Original skill document
Rendered from the source repository. Headings, examples, code, tables, links, and referenced images are preserved.
collect-independent-judgments
Purpose
Collect blinded judgments from genuinely independent evaluators or perspectives before exposing peer outputs.
Input contract
yaml
required: [judgment_prompt, evaluator_roster, candidate_set, independence_rules]
optional: [rubric, response_deadline, abstention_policy]
constraints: [evaluators receive no peer judgments; each ballot preserves rationale and provenance]Procedure
- Freeze the candidate set, rubric, prompt, and independence rules before collection.
- Obtain one sealed judgment and rationale per evaluator, recording abstentions and unavailable evidence.
- Check for shared data, model, prompt, or deliberation leakage before unblinding.
- Unblind only after collection, then return ballots, independence flags, and an aggregation-ready dataset.
If independent judgments are complete and their provenance is preserved, consider aggregate-ranking as the next tactic.
Output contract
yaml
produces: [sealed_ballots, independence_audit, rationale_set, aggregation_dataset]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]Quality gates
- A-class gate: declared universe = all commissioned evaluator ballots; numerator = ballots complete, provenance-linked, and leakage-free; batch increment = one sealed ballot; stopping reason = roster exhausted or a declared quorum reached with all exclusions documented; source references = evaluator, prompt, data, and ballot IDs; direction/threshold reason = independence confidence decreases with shared inputs or peer exposure.
- No aggregation before the leakage check is complete.
Failure and counterexamples
Do not count multiple roles using the same evidence as independent judgments. An abstention is a recorded outcome, not a missing pass.
Provenance map
- resolved: collective-adjudication
