yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

collect-independent-judgments

Collect judgments/rankings from multiple genuinely independent evaluators or perspectives before exposing any peer outputs, preserving ballots and rationale for later social-choice aggregation.

ソースを見る

使い方

  1. インストールコマンドをコピーし、自分の環境へ導入する前にソースを確認します。
  2. 必要なツール、認証情報、対応環境を原文で確認します。
  3. 入力と成果物を指定し、出力を資料と照合します。
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill collect-independent-judgments

開始前の確認

  • 導入にはモデル契約、API枠、ファイルへのアクセス許可は含まれません。
  • スター数や導入数は活動の指標であり、独立した品質・安全性試験ではありません。
リポジトリの原文

見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。

collect-independent-judgments

Purpose

Collect blinded judgments from genuinely independent evaluators or perspectives before exposing peer outputs.

Input contract

yaml
required: [judgment_prompt, evaluator_roster, candidate_set, independence_rules]
optional: [rubric, response_deadline, abstention_policy]
constraints: [evaluators receive no peer judgments; each ballot preserves rationale and provenance]

Procedure

  1. Freeze the candidate set, rubric, prompt, and independence rules before collection.
  2. Obtain one sealed judgment and rationale per evaluator, recording abstentions and unavailable evidence.
  3. Check for shared data, model, prompt, or deliberation leakage before unblinding.
  4. Unblind only after collection, then return ballots, independence flags, and an aggregation-ready dataset.

If independent judgments are complete and their provenance is preserved, consider aggregate-ranking as the next tactic.

Output contract

yaml
produces: [sealed_ballots, independence_audit, rationale_set, aggregation_dataset]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]

Quality gates

  • A-class gate: declared universe = all commissioned evaluator ballots; numerator = ballots complete, provenance-linked, and leakage-free; batch increment = one sealed ballot; stopping reason = roster exhausted or a declared quorum reached with all exclusions documented; source references = evaluator, prompt, data, and ballot IDs; direction/threshold reason = independence confidence decreases with shared inputs or peer exposure.
  • No aggregation before the leakage check is complete.

Failure and counterexamples

Do not count multiple roles using the same evidence as independent judgments. An abstention is a recorded outcome, not a missing pass.

Provenance map

  • resolved: collective-adjudication

タスクに関連する項目

同じリポジトリから

関連する Skills

すべての Skills